Chelation Therapy
Chelation therapy
involves the intravenous infusion of EDTA
(ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid) over a
course of treatments in a doctor's office.
EDTA is a synthetic amino acid, which has the
ability to attach itself to metals and minerals, forming a particular kind of bond
called a chelate.
Once the chelate is formed it is
naturally excreted from the body. Essentially, chelation therapy “washes out” heavy metals
and minerals from the body.
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ("EDTA")
is a synthetic amino acid first used in the
1940's for treatment of heavy metal poisoning.
It is widely recognized as effective for that
use as well as certain others, including
emergency treatment of hypercalcemia and the
control of ventricular arrhythmias associated
with digitalis toxicity. Studies by the
National Academy of Sciences/National Research
Council in the late 1960's indicated that EDTA
was considered possibly effective in the
treatment of occlusive vascular disorders
caused by arteriosclerosis.
Clinical experience with EDTA chelation
therapy has convinced substantial numbers of
licensed physicians in North America that it
is a safe and effective treatment for
atherosclerotic vascular disease, as it
consistently improves blood flow and relieves
symptoms associated with the disease in
greater than 80% of the patients treated. As
members of the medical profession are
generally aware, the pathogenesis of
atherosclerotic disease is extraordinarily
complex. The scientific principles underlying
the efficacy of EDTA chelation therapy in
impeding each step of the disease process are
beyond the scope of this overview, but
they are elaborated upon in the many published
clinical studies and research papers
available.
In its simplest terms, the rationale for
its efficacy is that EDTA, in binding ionic
metal catalysts and removing them from the
body, reduces subsequent abnormal production
of oxygen free radical reactive molecules and
molecular fragments which react destructively
with other molecules. See, E. M.
Cranton, J. P. Frackelton, Free Radical
Pathology in Age-Associated Diseases:
Treatment with EDTA Chelation, Nutrition, and
Antioxidants, Journal of Advancement in
Medicine, Vol.
2, Nos. 1, 2, Spring/Summer, 1989.1
There is now widespread agreement that EDTA
removes metallic catalysts which cause
excessive oxygen free radical proliferation,
thereby reducing pathological lipid
peroxidation of cell membranes, DNA, enzyme
systems and lipoproteins and allowing the
body's natural healing mechanisms to halt and
often reverse the disease process.
Steinberg, et al., state in the April 6,
1989, New England Journal of Medicine,
1989; 320(14):915-924, concerning Modifications
of Low-density Lipoprotein That Increase Its
Atherogenicity through free radical
peroxidation, "oxidative modification is
absolutely dependent on low concentrations of
copper or iron in the medium and is therefore
completely inhibited by
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)."2
Chelation therapy is considered by the physicians who utilize it to be an
effective first step alternative to surgical
treatment for atherosclerotic vascular disease
in most cases. In the instances where a physician believes that bypass
surgery or the interventional cardiac
catheterization techniques of thrombolysis and
balloon angioplasty are more appropriate, he
or she will refer those patients out. These
alternatives to chelation therapy though are
not without their respective detractors and
attendant risks.
In September 1978 the Office of Technology
Assessment ("OTA"), a branch of the
United States Congress, aided by an advisory
board composed of leading medical and
university school faculty, published a report
entitled Assessing the Efficacy and Safety
of Medical Technologies. One portion of
that report discussed the efficacy and safety
of surgery for coronary artery disease,
concluding as follows:
Coronary
artery bypass surgery is based on a scientific
rationale and may be of measurable benefit to
some patients. It is usually performed for
angina pectoris and appears to give
substantial relief from symptoms, but the
extent to which this relief is an effect of
surgery is not known. Limited studies
suggest that coronary bypass surgery improves
life expectancy significantly for only a small
number of patients, with a particular type
of coronary artery disease. Controlled
studies have shown no improvement in life
expectancy for patients studied (emphasis
added). Id.
at page 44. 3
The importance of this analysis is its
recognition, though over 70,000 operations
were performed in 1977, that the benefits of
such surgery have yet to be demonstrated.4
Another article in the New England
Journal of Medicine (March 22, 1984)
reported upon myocardial infarction and
mortality in the coronary artery surgery study
(CASS) randomized trial, and summarized as
follows in the Abstract:
ABSTRACT:
There were no statistically significant
differences in the survival rate or in the
myocardial infarction rate between subgroups
of patients randomly assigned to medical and
to surgical therapy when they were analyzed
according to initial group assignment, number
of diseased vessels, or ejection fraction.
Therefore, as compared with medical therapy,
coronary bypass surgery appears neither to
prolong life nor to prevent myocardial
infarction in patients who have mild angina or
who are asymptomatic after infarction in the
five-year period after coronary angiography. 5
The necessity of heart surgery and the
scheduling of such surgery have undergone
substantial criticism of late by many in the
medical community. Despite this criticism, in
1981 an estimated 110,000 patients underwent
bypass surgery. By 1983 the annual number of
operations had increased to 191,000, and by
1989 the number had soared to over 368,000.6
As stated by Dr. Thomas A. Preston,
professor of cardiology at the University of
Washington School of Medicine and chief of
cardiology at Pacific Medical Center:
[Coronary-bypass
surgery] is heralded by the popular press,
aggrandized by our profession, and actively
sought by the consuming public. It is the
epitome of modern medical technology. Yet, as
it is now practiced, its net effect on the
nation's health is probably negative. The
operation does not cure patients, it is
scandalously overused, and its high cost
drains resources from other important areas of
need.
Fully
half of the bypass operations performed in the
United States are unnecessary. A decade of
scientific study has shown that except in
certain well-defined situations, bypass
surgery does not save lives or even prevent
heart attacks: Among patients who suffer
from coronary-artery disease, those who are
treated without surgery enjoy the same
survival rates as those who undergo open-heart
surgery (emphasis added). MD Magazine,
Feb. 1995.
In an article entitled The
Appropriateness of Performing Coronary Artery
By-Pass Surgery published by the American
Medical Association in JAMA 1988,
260: 505- 509, the authors report the results of
a randomized study conducted to determine the
level of judiciousness currently being applied
by physicians in performing coronary artery
bypass surgery. The authors report that only
fifty-six percent (56%) of the surgeries were
performed for appropriate reasons. As
stated in the abstract to this article,
"eliminating the performance of [such]
inappropriate procedures may lead to
reductions in health care expenditures or to
improved patient outcomes."
Balloon angioplasty is an alternative to
venous grafting which is enjoying increased
popularity among vascular surgeons. Experience
with this technique, though, has shown that
serious complications, including permanent
renal failure, occur in up to 8% of cases and
that technical failure rates for iliac and
femoral angioplasties occur in up to 50% of
cases.7
Moreover, it must be remembered that both this
technique and venous grafting are very point
specific, in distinct contrast to chelation
therapy, which benefits the entire vascular
system. Furthermore, the costs associated with
the various treatment modalities are widely
disparate. A typical bypass surgery costs the
patient in excess of $30,000.00, the usual
balloon angioplasty over $12,000.00, and an
average course of chelation treatments
$3,000.00 to $5,000.00, including ancillary
costs.
The scientific rationale of chelation
therapy is demonstrated in the before noted
article of E. M. Cranton, M.D. and J. P.
Frackelton, M.D. As stated in the Abstract:
"Recent discoveries in the field of free
radical pathology provide a coherent, unifying
scientific basis to explain the many and
diverse benefits reported from treatment with
EDTA chelation therapy. The free radical
concept provides a scientific basis for
treatment and prevention of the major causes
of disability and death, including
arteriosclerosis, dementia, cancer, arthritis
and numerous other diseases. EDTA chelation
therapy, nutritional supplementation, physical
exercise and moderation of health destroying
habits all have common therapeutic mechanisms
which reduce free radical causes of
age-related diseases."
Chelation therapy, like bypass surgery and
angioplasty, is based upon a scientific
rationale and is of measurable benefit to
patients. There is no reason why surgery
should be condoned, while chelation therapy is
often condemned simply because it has not
heretofore undergone large-scale,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
As elaborated upon in the OTA report, only
10 to 20 percent of all procedures currently
used in medical practices have been
shown to be efficacious by controlled trial.8
The efficacy of chelation therapy has been
clinically demonstrated to thousands of
doctors through positive results in hundreds
of thousands of cases where this treatment was
utilized. One pilot double blind study has
already been completed with strongly favorable
results.9
The safety of this therapy, when properly
administered, is not an issue. It is estimated
that physicians utilizing the protocol
developed by the American College for
Advancement in Medicine nationally have safely
treated over 500,000 patients with this
therapy.10
No reported fatalities have occurred in the
United States when the ACAM protocol has been
followed. Whenever chelation is used in its
widely-accepted role to combat lead poisoning,
the dosages given even to children are
administered much more rapidly than those
administered to adults under this protocol.
The risks associated with surgical procedures
are far greater by comparison.
The Food and Drug Administration
determined that EDTA chelation therapy was
safe prior to approving the
Investigational New Drug protocol for the
ongoing double-blind placebo-controlled
studies.
It is the treating, clinical physician who
is best acquainted with the patient's medical
history, examination results, condition and
needs. It is the attending physician who is in
the best position to assess the condition
(medical, socioeconomic, and psychological) of
the patient as well as what constitutes the
best treatment for the patient. Despite
criticism in the form of opinions from
physicians who characteristically have never
utilized the treatment modality, not a single
valid study has ever been shown to support or
warrant such distraction.
Under current
treatment protocols, EDTA chelation therapy is
safe and relatively free of side effects which
may include, but are not limited to,
discomfort at the injection site,
thrombophebitis, fatigue, hypocalcemia, muscle
cramps, nausea, vomiting, allergic reaction
(although rare), nephrotoxicity
(although rare), congestive heart failure,
liver disease, anticoagulation, lowering of
blood sugar levels, mineral loss, shock
(although rare), infection, and generalized
complaints. Chelation therapy patients are advised to take
a comprehensive approach to their treatment
and health, including diet,
exercise, stress management programs and
dietary supplements. As with any other medical
treatment, patients should insure that their
treating physicians have appropriate training
and credentials for administration of EDTA
chelation therapy.
11
Despite the lack
of controlled scientific studies as proof of
its effectiveness, physicians have used EDTA
chelation therapy for over fifty years to
treat such related diseases as cardiovascular
disease, diabetic arterial disease, decreased
mental function from vascular disease and
intermittent claudication (leg pain with
exercise). Many of these doctors also use EDTA
in preventive medicine.
There an in-depth
wealth of information from reliable sources
available on the web about chelation; some
useful web sites include:
11http://www.acam.org/
The American College for Advancement in
Medicine (ACAM) provides a position paper and
further information on chelation.
http://nccam.nih.gov/news/2002/chelation/pressrelease.htm/
“NIH Launches Large Clinical Trial on
EDTA Chelation Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease”
http://216.185.112.5/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3000843
American Heart Association. Questions and
answers about chelation therapy.